Hypnosis has long been a controversial topic in the field of psychology, particularly when it comes to its ability to unlock supposedly repressed memories in a person's mind. This phenomenon, often portrayed in movies and television shows, has led to the popular belief that hypnosis can bring forgotten or repressed memories of traumatic experiences to the surface. However, the reality behind this myth is much more complex and questionable than most people believe.

The origin of the myth

The myth of memories "unlocked" by hypnosis has its roots in the early years of psychotherapy, when Sigmund Freud and his followers popularized the idea that many psychological problems had their origin in traumatic memories repressed in the unconscious mind. Freud believed that these memories, usually from childhood, were the underlying cause of psychological symptoms in a person's adult life, and that the task of psychoanalysis was to recover and confront these repressed memories to achieve healing.

The influence of popular culture

Over the years, the idea of repressed memories has been widely disseminated by popular culture, including movies, books, and television shows. These fictional depictions have contributed to the widespread belief that traumatic memories can be buried deep in a person's mind and that hypnosis is an effective tool for recovering them.

In films such as " Past Life Regressions" and "The Power of Hypnosis" feature dramatic depictions of people reliving scenes from their past lives or remembering traumatic events they had completely forgotten. These sensational depictions have fueled the public perception that hypnosis has the power to unlock lost memories and resolve psychological problems quickly and definitively.

The limitations of hypnosis in memory recovery

Despite the popularity of the idea that hypnosis can unlock repressed memories, scientific evidence actually suggests the opposite. Numerous studies have shown that hypnosis is not a reliable method for recovering accurate and complete memories of past events, especially traumatic events. In fact, hypnosis can be prone to creating false memories and even distorting the truth.

Suggestibility and external influence

One of the biggest problems with hypnosis in recovery memories is the high suggestibility of people under a hypnotic state. When a person is in a hypnotic trance, they are more likely to accept outside suggestions and influences, which can lead to the involuntary creation of false memories. Therapists who use hypnosis to recover memories may unintentionally influence their patients' responses and lead them to remember events that never occurred.

In addition, hypnosis is not a neutral process. The way questions and suggestions are presented during a hypnosis session can significantly affect how a person remembers an event or experience. This can distort reality and make the recovered memories inaccurate or incomplete.

The role of confabulation

Another factor to consider is the phenomenon of confabulation, which is the tendency of the mind to fill gaps in memory with invented or inaccurate information. During a hypnosis session, a person may confabulate details about a past event with the intention of filling in gaps in their memory. These false memories can seem so real and vivid that the person accepts them as true, creating a fictional narrative that is not based in reality.

The ethics of using hypnosis to recover traumatic memories

Given the lack of reliability and accuracy of hypnosis in the recovery of traumatic memories, the ethical question arises as to whether this technique should be used in a therapeutic context. Therapists and psychologists should be extremely careful when considering using hypnosis to help patients remember traumatic events, as there is a risk of creating false memories or causing additional harm to the person.

The importance of corroborating memories

In cases where a patient remembers a traumatic event during a hypnosis session, it is essential to corroborate those memories with objective evidence and external verification. Corroboration of memories through independent sources, such as medical records, witness testimony, or other documentary evidence, is essential to determine the veracity of recovered memories and avoid the influence of suggestion or confabulation.

It is important to remember that memory is a complex and fallible process, and that memories can be easily distorted or altered by external factors. Therefore, the recovery of traumatic memories through hypnosis must be approached with extreme caution and professionalism, focusing on protecting the well-being and integrity of the person seeking help.

Final Conclusions

< In short, the myth of memories "unlocked" by hypnosis is a belief rooted in popular culture that has been widely debunked by science and psychological research. Hypnosis is not a reliable method for recovering accurate and complete memories of past events, especially traumatic events, and its use for this purpose raises serious ethical and practical concerns.

It is essential that therapists and psychologists keep informed about the limits and risks of hypnosis in the recovery of traumatic memories, and consider safer, evidence-based therapeutic alternatives to help people heal and overcome their psychological problems. The protection and well-being of patients must always be the priority in any therapeutic approach, and the use of techniques such as hypnosis must be carefully evaluated and monitored to avoid potential harm and misunderstanding.